The CASSE position on economic growth (below) was carefully crafted after years of study.  It has been sanctioned by many leaders in sustainability science.  The position is important for demonstrating widespread understanding of the conflict between economic growth and environmental protection.  The more we can demonstrate such understanding, the more viable the steady state economy becomes in political and policy discussions.  Please e-sign and ask your friends and colleagues to do the same!  Additional contact information is completely optional and held in private.
CASSE Position on Economic Growth

Whereas:

1)  Economic growth, as defined in standard economics textbooks, is an increase in the production and consumption of goods and services, and;

2)  Economic growth occurs when there is an increase in the multiplied product of population and per capita consumption, and;

3)  The global economy grows as an integrated whole consisting of agricultural, extractive, manufacturing, and services sectors that require physical inputs and produce wastes, and;

4)  Economic growth is often and generally indicated by increasing real gross domestic product (GDP) or real gross national product (GNP), and;

5)  Economic growth has been a primary, perennial goal of many societies and most governments, and;

6)  Based upon established principles of physics and ecology, there is a limit to economic growth, and;

7)  There is increasing evidence that global economic growth is having negative effects on long-term ecological and economic welfare...

Therefore, we take the position that: 

1)  There is a fundamental conflict between economic growth and environmental protection (for example, biodiversity conservation, clean air and water, atmospheric stability), and;

2)  There is a fundamental conflict between economic growth and the ecological services underpinning the human economy (for example, pollination, decomposition, climate regulation), and;

3)  Technological progress has had many positive and negative ecological and economic effects and may not be depended on to reconcile the conflict between economic growth and long-term ecological and economic welfare, and;

4)  Economic growth, as gauged by increasing GDP, is an increasingly dangerous and anachronistic goal, especially in wealthy nations with widespread affluence, and;

5)  A steady state economy (that is, an economy with a relatively stable, mildly fluctuating product of population and per capita consumption) is a viable alternative to a growing economy and has become a more appropriate goal in large, wealthy economies, and;

6)  The long-run sustainability of a steady state economy requires its establishment at a size small enough to avoid the breaching of reduced ecological and economic capacity during expected or unexpected supply shocks such as droughts and energy shortages, and;

7)  A steady state economy does not preclude economic development, a dynamic, qualitative process in which different technologies may be employed and the relative prominence of economic sectors may evolve, and;

8)  Upon establishing a steady state economy, it would be advisable for wealthy nations to assist other nations in moving from the goal of economic growth to the goal of a steady state economy, beginning with those nations currently enjoying high levels of per capita consumption, and;

9)  For many nations with widespread poverty, increasing per capita consumption (or, alternatively, more equitable distributions of wealth) remains an appropriate goal.


Does the CASSE Position Change with the Times?

The CASSE position has been available for e-signing since May 1, 2004.  Although it was designed with global implications, it was also focused to some degree on economic growth in the United States.  It was slightly revised on June 3, 2008, to reflect growing concerns about global economic growth and the need for wealthy nations to take the first steps in moving toward a steady state economy.  CASSE does not modify the technical aspects of the position, as these are based on long-established scientific principles.  The original CASSE position is posted here, with the revisions readily discernible.




Organizations that Have Adopted a Position on Economic Growth or Endorsed the CASSE Position

Scientific, professional, and conservation organizations that have adopted a position on economic growth:
- United States Society for Ecological Economics (2003)
- Society for Conservation Biology, North America Section (2004).
- The Wildlife Society (2004)
- American Society of Mammalogists (2007)
- British Columbia Field Ornithologists (2007)
- Lillooet Naturalist Society, Lillooet, British Columbia, Canada, (2007)
- Arrowsmith Naturalists, Parksville, British Columbia, Canada (2008)
- Federation of British Columbia Naturalists (BC Nature), North Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada (2008)

Private, corporate, nonprofit, and political ogranizations that have endorsed the CASSE position:
- Earth Economics, Seattle, WA, USA, 2004
- Coast Range Association, Corvallis, Oregon, USA, 2004
- Conservation Planning Institute, Corvallis, Oregon, USA, 2005
- Sisk-a-dee, Gunnison, Colorado, USA, 2005
- Sustainable Obtainable Solutions, Helena, Montana, USA, 2005
- Ecological Internet, Inc., Denmark, Wisconsin, USA, 2005
- Work Less Party, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, 2005
- The Land Institute, Salina, Kansas, USA, 2005
- Genersys PLC, London, UK, 2006
- Qualicum Institute, Parksville, British Columbia, Canada, 2006
- Sustainable Scale Project, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, 2006
- Forrest Hill for Secretary of State, Oakland, California, USA, 2006
- Fodor and Associates, Eugene, Oregon, USA, 2006
- Gaia Preservation Coalition, Picton, Ontario, Canada, 2007
- Coos County Alternatives To Growth, Coos Bay, Oregon, USA, 2007
- Share The World's Resources, London, United Kingdom, 2007
- Gaian Economics, Stroud, United Kingdom, 2007
- National Center for Conservation Science and Policy, Ashland, Oregon, USA, 2007
- Campaign for Sustainable Economics, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA, 2007
- Martin Environmental Services, Heriot Bay, British Columbia, Canada, 2007
- Nature and Wildlife Nepal, Kathmandu, Nepal, 2007
- Sustainable Saratoga Springs, Saratoga Springs, New York, USA, 2007
- Statistical Design, Inc., Seattle, Washington, USA, 2007
- Rushing Rivers Institute, Amherst, Massachusetts, USA, 2007
- Inspiring Green Leadership, Bay Area, California, USA, 2008
- Raedeke Associates, Inc., Seattle, Washington, USA, 2008
- La Fundacion Neotropica, Turrialba, Costa Rica, 2008
- Environmental Research Foundation, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA, 2008
- Abraham Paiss and Associates, Boulder, Colorado, USA, 2008
- The Sustainability Project, Lanark, Ontario, Canada, 2008
- Vermonters for a Sustainable Population, Washington, Vermont, USA, 2008
- Institute for Children's Environmental Health, Freeland, Washington, USA, 2008
- Rhode Island Prosperity Project, Providence, Rhode Island, USA, 2008

If you are interested in having your organization endorse the CASSE position, please contact us.
Required information
Optional information (held in private)
Position on Economic Growth
Read the CASSE position
View individual signatures
(updated weekly)
Sign by filling in the following information and clicking submit.
How did you find out about CASSE?
View organizations that have
adopted a position
Center for the Advancement of the Steady State Economy
5101 South 11th St., Arlington, VA   22204
Last Name
First Name
City
State/Province (if applicable)
Country of Citizenship
E-Mail Address (if you want to recieve news)
Occupation or Affiliation
Do you have any comments?
Take a stand on
economic growth
Home
Sign Petition
Donate
CENTER
for the
ADVANCEMENT
of the
STEADY STATE ECONOMY
Click here to invite your family, friends, and colleagues to sign...
I hereby endorse the CASSE position.