Christ Didn’t Shop for Christmas Presents (Much Less Jets and Guns)

Editor’s note: This essay originally appeared December 23, 2020 and is slightly modified.

by Brian Czech
consumption

What happened to the little, sustainable Nativity set? (CC0, Source)

With Christmas two weeks out, folks are making tough decisions about Christmas presents. The public is rattled by inflation, credit card debt is through the roof, and gift-giving is a real strain for many. My advice for anyone stressing out over Christmas presents is simple:  Take a break from the shopping!

It’s true that little kids galore are expecting presents from gramma, grampa, and Santa Claus. But is that a good thing to encourage? This year provides a chance for children to learn about the real meaning of Christmas. If you’re a Christian, the meaning should be simple enough to convey. Even if you’re not, Christmas 2023 is still an opportunity for teaching kids about material scarcity and the need to conserve. They’ll need such lessons for the 21st century!

With or without a current pandemic, isn’t it high time for a re-set on the material expectations of Christmas? Christmas lights, reindeer ornaments, inflatable Santas, larger-than-life snowmenBig Dots of Happiness…and that’s before we even step inside! Then in the house we have Christmas trees (chopped down or plastic), another set of lights, presents under the tree, and basically the whole set of lawn ornaments in miniaturized form, on and about the tree. Half of this junk is thrown out and replaced the following year.

What happened to the little Nativity set, re-used for decades? It told the real story of Christmas, or Christ’s mass. Made out of wood, no electricity needed, and possibly even hand-carved, it also told a story of sustainable consumption. I like to believe there’s no coincidence here. I believe, in other words, that Christianity and sustainable consumption are supposed to go hand in hand.

Christ Wasn’t Much of a Consumer

I’m no theologian, but I was born and raised a Catholic. I read the Bible and learned the Catechism. All that teaching left me with plenty of uncertainty that plagues me to this day. Yet there’s one thing I’d bet the farm on: Christ was no conspicuous consumer.

consumption

Jesus wasn’t into shopping. (CC0Source)

The New Testament—supplemented by biblical archeology—has a lot to say about Christ’s lifestyle, starting with food, clothing, and shelter. His diet was typically at the subsistence level, with plenty of fasting. He probably wore a mantle (a type of shawl), sandals, and a one-piece tunic; “extremely basic.” It’s unclear whether Christ ever owned a home. As a child, he lived in a house with Mary and Joseph. A passage in the Book of Mark suggests he might have had a house as an adult. Yet he spent much of his life on the road—on foot—teaching whoever would listen, giving little thought to living quarters.

If Christ had a house at all, I’m guessing it lacked a swimming pool, wine cellar, and gold-plated bedroom.

Let’s face it: Jesus wasn’t much of a shopper. The one time we find him interacting in the marketplace, he’s driving the moneylenders out! This we read in the Book of John:

“In the temple he found people selling cattle, sheep, and doves, and the money changers seated at their tables. Making a whip of cords, he drove all of them out of the temple, both the sheep and the cattle. He also poured out the coins of the money changers and overturned their tables. He told those who were selling the doves ‘Take these things out of here! Stop making my Father’s house a marketplace!’”

Of course, those were the days long before the study of “political economy” and debates over laissez-faire capitalism vs. socialism (democratic or authoritarian). It would be crazy to call Christ a Keynesian, a Georgist, or a Marxist. But he sure didn’t find much redemption in the peddling of goods. That’s enough to know with regard to Christmas shopping.

“Prosperity Gospel”— A Theological Oxymoron?

Despite all we read in the Bible about Christ living frugally, we have (primarily in the USA) televangelist pastors who preach a so-called “prosperity gospel,” the notion that Christian faith will lead to material wealth. So, when you give to the church (such as for building a bigger church), it’s sort of a financial investment mixed in with your witnessing for Christ. Theoretically, then, you’d have more money for Christmas presents later.

This prosperity gospel goes back to the late Oral Roberts, and disciples today include the likes of Joel Osteen, Kenneth Copeland, and the unbelievably named Creflo Dollar. Dollar owns two Rolls-Royces, a private jet, and multi-million dollar mansions. Another prosperity preacher is Jesse Duplantis, known for inspiring his followers to buy him private jets. Evidently he’s had four of them—“just burning them up for the Lord,” he says. His latest ride is the Falcon 7X. It flies near the speed of sound with noise-limiting acoustic technology, a Bluetooth-enabled entertainment center, and an in-flight shower.

Whatever happened to the teaching of Christ, “it is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for a rich man to enter the kingdom of God” (Matthew 19:24)? Maybe with a jet, you can just blast your way on through there before anyone notices.

That reminds me of a little story. One time I was giving a talk to a small group of faith leaders in Washington, DC. They’d asked me to talk about limits to economic growth and provide a synopsis of the steady state economy. We then went around the group, maybe ten people in all, and discussed the issues. One minister stroked his chin for a moment and then, deep in thought, stated matter-of-factly, “The steady state economy; now that’s the Kingdom of God.”

As I recall, he was an Episcopalian pastor. While he didn’t elaborate with a theological argument, I think he was getting at the fact that Christians wouldn’t be conspicuous consumers. Instead, they would conserve, caring for creation and leaving room for future generations and non-human species. That resonated with me, and it seems consistent with the life of St. Francis and the teachings of Pope Francis, most notably in the Laudato si’, the Pope’s encyclical on “Care for Our Common Home.”

When it comes to consumption and consumerism, who should we put more stock in: Pope Francis or Creflo Dollar?

Which Collection of Semi-Automatic Rifles and Handguns—Plus Designer Ammo and Shooting Accessories—Would Jesus Haul Out with the Hummer to the Thousand-Acre Moving Target Range?

As you might guess from the heading, I’m going full-preacher mode here. Normally I’d have little standing for preaching purposes, but the notion of “God and Guns” is some of the lowest-hanging fruit I’ve ever seen for an ethical critique. It makes as much sense as “Broccoli and Buns.” It’s a pair that just doesn’t fit. That’s relevant here because guns and ammo—and copious paraphernalia—are increasingly common Christmas presents.

St. Francis and consumption

St. Francis of Assisi established a Catholic tradition of caring for creation, a tradition underpinning the theology and teachings of Pope Francis. (CC BY 2.0Enrique López-Tamayo Biosca)

I could use any number of sectors or products to illustrate how ludicrous it is to think of conspicuous consumption as congruent with Christianity. Maseratis, mansions, McMansions, fancy furniture, thousand-dollar bottles of wine…let’s keep them all in mind. Yet something is particularly, exceptionally, ridiculously ludicrous in the case of guns, and more broadly the “shooting sports” sector.

Don’t get me wrong: I’m not against guns per se—far from it. But here’s the thing: The NRA likes to point out that guns don’t shoot people: people do. Well, by that logic, I’d like to point out that guns didn’t coin the idiotic slogan “God and Guns,” either. Neither did God. Gun nuts did.

And of course, a lot depends on the type of gun. I’m not against mufflers either, but I don’t like those outlawed mufflers designed to make the most noise. Not many of us do; that’s why they were outlawed! Similarly, assault rifles with hundred-shot drum magazines are obnoxious as hell and let’s face it: they reek of evil.

I grew up in a hunting and fishing culture and I’ve always had a rifle or two (for deer hunting mostly) and a shotgun or two (for turkeys and such). One good firearm lasts a lifetime and more. I take a certain amount of pride, too, in the lost art of using a single rifle shell per year for venison (maybe two if the freezer is low) and maybe a handful of shotgun shells. I don’t mind hearing a few shots in the distance during deer season. In other words, I’m still not against inconspicuous consumption of guns and ammo. I also understand the country-boy resistance to Second Amendment infringement.

But we’re not talking about the Second Amendment here. We’re talking about a 21st century cultural phenomenon of conspicuous consumption in the shooting sector. It will play out over the holidays in counties across the country.

Most city dwellers are oblivious to this, but we have an entire subculture out in the countryside these days, including weekenders from the city, driving out with Hummers and SUVs, then jumping onto four-wheelers and spending countless hours pumping out rounds—hundreds per hour—from semi-automatic assault rifles, shooting targets spiked with Tannerite and leaving a nasty footprint specific to the shooting sports. It may not always be visually conspicuous, but if you’re within a mile, your ears will be polluted with the sound of wanton waste of time, energy, and lead.

When gun nuts get rambunctiously political, the visuals can be uglier still!

a series of 18 photos of armed protestors

Results from a Google search on “armed protesters” (12/8/23).

 

I don’t know about you, but I can’t picture Jesus Christ with an AR-15. No way. Not for hunting, protesting, or anything at all. Branded as “America’s rifle,” this phenom of the market hits the bullseye only if you’re shooting for a noise-making, peace-wrecking, lead-polluting, obnoxia-producing Christmas present!

In the Name of God

If you’re a Christian—and maybe if you’re not—you have to be really careful with the name of God. That’s the Third Commandment! The “God and Guns” crowd might want to stand down and reload with new rhetoric. Or the God crowd, at least, might want to separate themselves from the gun nuts.

It’s one thing to pair, for example, “God and Guts” (for bravery) or “God and Grits” (for salt-of-the-earth sensibility). Or even something vaguely (very vaguely) geopolitical, like “God and the Grange.” But for God’s sake, “God and Guns?” That’s about as edifying as “God and Gambling” or maybe “God and Gossip.”

Just because you have a right to gamble, gossip, or bear arms doesn’t pair it with God. You have a right to shell peanuts in church, too, but that hardly makes it godly. In my opinion, when you start hearing “God and Guns” chatter, the country’s on the road to perdition.

Similarly, the “prosperity gospel” reeks of “green growth” deceit. It’s just an excuse for extravagant living and greed. I bet Christ would have nothing to do with it.

He wouldn’t be buying many Christmas presents, either. (He might donate to Smile Train, though.)


Brian Czech is CASSE’s Executive Director.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
8 replies
  1. Clif Ware
    Clif Ware says:

    Brian, this essay is a masterful commentary on the authentic spirit of Christmas, a seasonal classic. I’ve shared it on Facebook, and via email with family and friends. Bravo–and thanks!

    Reply
  2. mErika
    mErika says:

    Dear Brian, you are a Francis in the midst of these worrying times. Thank you ever so much for these inspiring, and what’s more, warmhearted thoughts. Wishing you and your beloved a wonderful Christmas. For that, eventually, is what that remembrance day is all about.
    Erika

    Reply
  3. Chris Kuykendall
    Chris Kuykendall says:

    Re: record credit card debit….

    We used to have a lieutenant governor in Texas who quoted a wise saying supposedly from his grandmother. I later found out that there have been probably umpteen zillion other politicians who have attributed the saying to THEIR grandmothers. The adage is generally thought to be about governmental fiscal conservatism or the lack thereof, but it can also be applied to family household frugality or the lack thereof, conserving various types of natural resources–anthropocentically or ecocentrically conceived–or squandering them, or respecting generally the only good planet within lots of light-years, and the ecological bounty it offers, or trashing both the bounty and/or the planet

    Thus, basic budgeting. The grandmother adage:

    “When your outgo exceeds your income, your upkeep will be your downfall.”

    Reply
  4. Gary Gardner
    Gary Gardner says:

    Submitted by Chris Kuykendall, via email:

    I think you’re wrong on the wine cellar, if not also the swimming pool, but–dang it!–I’m having a hard time finding them. I was thinking they were in Luke, or maybe Mark. I’ll keep looking and get back to you.

    Sincerely,
    “Mike Johnson”
    Speaker of the U.S. House of Representatives

    Reply
  5. Cole Thompson
    Cole Thompson says:

    That Episcopalian pastor’s comment to Brian is intriguing – I’d like to think there is some opportunity for more “ah-ha!” moments of epiphany out there:

    The steady economy IS the Kingdom of God.

    Reply
  6. Robert Cluck
    Robert Cluck says:

    Yes, yes, yes!!! Perfect article that I will be sharing.
    RE: “He wouldn’t be buying many Christmas presents, either. (He might donate to Smile Train, though.)” I have for decades asked that if a family member wishes to give me a present for Christmas to please make a donation to a non-profit I support. I generally only give presents to children.
    As a related note, awhile back I heard about the “platinum rule,” or at least what the author called it. The “golden rule” is rather narcissistic. The “platinum rule” is “do unto others as they would have you do until them.”

    Reply
  7. Nick Marconi
    Nick Marconi says:

    Hi Brian,

    I concur with your description of Jesus as not consumer oriented. What amazes me is how we could have so-called Christian society so bound up with an ethos of having more and even more. I always love your creative and color use of metaphor; it’s inspiring! There is one thing I would like to comment on a little; it is your mention of this Christmas being “an opportunity of teaching kids about material scarcity and the need to conserve”. While I agree with the moral and ecological intention behind this statement, I think it is precisely in our focus on this “scarcity” that gets us into thinking that one, there is never enough to go around and two, that we naturally need to compete with one another to get what we want. So, economics is looked upon the best way to balance so-called unlimited wants( note, not “needs”) with limited resources. The market system of competitive exchange using a pricing mechanism goes basically unchallenged and so we are forced to position ourselves financially to best beat out the competing efforts of others in giving us access to the economic output. What goes unnoticed is that we actually cooperate in producing this output; how else could we do produce it? It is my contention that this competition in our current market system in terms of access to this output that leads to what seems like greed, a focus on having and getting more and a growth ideology. What we need is then to refocus on that cooperative aspect of our present market economy to make access to the wealth we produce into a cooperative effort. But, this would mean thinking through the politics involved in how the economic system functions. This would mean transitioning away from a competitive politics which is win/lose, a scenario that sets up all of us to lose to a co-operative politics based on our cooperative efforts that produces real wealth to address our needs which in turn is based on having “enough”, not more. And, think Jesus would approve.

    Joyful Season

    Reply
  8. Robin Schaufler
    Robin Schaufler says:

    Love your wit, Brian! If you can’t kill ’em with kindness, kill ’em with comedy. And you are dead on. Great article.

    Okay, so now I’m curious what you think of presents that have been pre-owned. Used books. Consignment store treasures. Regifted jigsaw puzzles. A way of giving that keeps good stuff in circulation and out of the landfill.

    Also, homemades. Home canned jam. Hand knitted scarves. Gifts that embody care, art, and time.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!
(No profanity, lewdness, or libel.)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *