Posts

What Kind of Example Is Canada Setting?

by Brent Blackwelder

BlackwelderIs any nation on Earth taking seriously the need for a true-cost economy, where we live sustainably in a steady state? I have been working with Randy Hayes, founder of the Rainforest Action Network and executive director of Foundation Earth, on a report card to determine if Canada might be such a nation. The report card reveals whether Canada is setting the example for how to run a country sustainably in the 21st century, or following the path of maximal exploitation of natural resources (the path followed by most nations and urged by the World Bank, IMF, WTO, and growth-obsessed economists).

We chose to examine Canada in part because of its history of compassion and global concern. Canada also has abundant natural ecosystems, lots of land and fresh water, and a relatively small population. This combination of assets puts Canadians in a better position than most to set policies for achieving a sustainable economy.

The report card, scheduled for release in June by Foundation Earth, grades the administration of Prime Minister Stephen Harper, as well as the provinces of Alberta and British Columbia, on key actions and policies in economics, ecology, and equity. It will present grades in sixteen categories.

Canada has the potential to achieve high marks across all categories (in fact, the report card highlights initiatives around the world that show what can be done to earn high grades). But much to our chagrin, we found that instead of taking actions to enhance the health of people and the planet, Canada has been reverting to the crass and outdated ways of cowboy economics: “exploit now, answer questions later.” The Harper administration receives failing grades in most of the sixteen categories, while Alberta and British Columbia do only slightly better. Although Vancouver, Toronto, and other locales have undertaken a number of sustainable economic initiatives, the Harper administration is promoting overly exploitative projects in most areas.

Given the collapse of leadership in the U.S. on innovative ecological and economic policy, Canada could have emerged as a worldwide leader on the shift to clean energy. The nation could have rejected mega-extraction projects that pollute the air and water and damage or destroy forests, grasslands, rivers, lakes, mountains, and valleys.

Instead, Canada is following the U.S.’s lead and dropping the ball. For example, Harper could have extended British Columbia’s carbon tax law of 2008 to the rest of the country. Sweden adopted a carbon tax in 1991 with good results. Harper could have pushed for extensive solar energy in Alberta and Saskatchewan where cities such as Edmonton, Calgary, and Regina have equal or better solar potential than Rome, Italy. Germany and Denmark have shown that northern nations can lead the way on solar, wind, and other renewable energy sources.

To get a sense of the grades we’re compiling in the report card, here’s a rundown of four categories:

1. Climate Disruption and Pollution

On climate policies, Canada is ranked 58th out of 61 nations that the European Climate Action Network analyzed. Only Saudi Arabia, Iran, and Kazakhstan ranked worse. This woeful ranking stems from projects like the Enbridge pipeline. Harper has pushed for this pipeline project that would carry tar sands oil across British Columbia to the port of Kitimat where supertankers would attempt to navigate difficult channels (and jeopardize the province’s magnificent northern coastline).

By removing protections from 99% of Canada’s natural water bodies, Harper has left 30,000 lakes and rivers vulnerable to corporate pollution. The Prime Minister has also sought to weaken water pollution standards and given permission to use more lakes as dumpsites.

2. Women’s Rights

When it comes to empowerment of women, Canada under Harper has fallen three places in the Global Gender Gap Index and now ranks 21st. Harper cut funding for the Status of Women department by 38% and closed twelve of its sixteen regional offices.

3. Rights of Indigenous People

In January 2006, Harper cancelled the Kelowna Accord, a historic agreement to clean up pollution that is poisoning First Nation people. The Harper government, along with some provincial governments, has systematically failed to respect indigenous rights and has cheered energy projects that severely impact the health of native people, their lands, and their waters.

4. Science-Based Decision Making

Reminiscent of an Orwellian state, Harper’s administration has eliminated scientific programs and refused to regard scientific findings on toxic contamination and the health of forests, fisheries, and oceans. Harper has led an outright assault on environmental groups, allocating millions to the charitable tax agency harassing these organizations.

Key institutions carrying out scientific work on the health of the Earth have been gutted and even shuttered, including the Polar Environment Atmospheric Research Laboratory in the High Arctic, the Experimental Lakes Area (an extraordinary 58-lake research venue in western Ontario), the national program on contaminants in marine mammals, and the Department of Fisheries and Oceans.

All scientific research in the National Parks has been terminated, and Environment Canada has cancelled its work on climate adaptation by laying off all eighteen scientists in the program. Top experts on ocean pollutants, marine mammals, contaminants in the St. Lawrence River, toxic flame retardants, and endocrine disruptors in fish have been dismissed.

The report card on Canada under the Harper administration will inform people of these disgraceful changes. Canada is moving farther and farther from a sustainable economy and is now a record-setting polluter where the gap between rich and poor is widening; where women, First Nations, and conservationists are under major attack; and where energy and mining companies are given a blank check to pillage the nation and the planet.

Many have tried to influence Harper to do what’s best for the environment and the economy over the long run. If the saying is true that, “You can lead a horse to water, but you can’t make it drink,” then maybe it’s time to put Harper out to political pasture. Although with the policies he’s been supporting, he might have a tough time finding drinkable water in that pasture.

The Hurricane Effect (Part 2)

Debt: Why Canada’s ‘strong economic fundamentals’ could yet blow over

James Johnston, Guest Author

A hurricane is a dynamic system. Heat, air and water create pocket thunderstorms that come together and gather strength in a powerful spiral effect, destroying whatever isn’t prepared for it on land. There’s a similar hurricane gathering strength in the global economy, as a self-reinforcing spiral of debt, money and materials hurls toward us, with most of us obliviously lying on the beach in our bathing suits and shades, assuming the calm weather will last indefinitely.

Read part one of The Hurricane Effect.

Last week, Canada’s Prime Minister, Stephen Harper, won an international tug-of-war against European proponents of a global bank tax – a tax which would have provided ‘insurance’ against any future crisis threatening collapse of the global financial system. Canadian officials have been globe-trotting to flaunt Canada’s exemplary standards and ‘strong economic fundamentals’ ever since the crisis broke. Due to what The Economist called a combination of ‘good policies’ and ‘good fortune’, Canadian banks didn’t go bust; in fact, they barely blinked. Why should Canadians be punished for good behavior?

While diligence is surely cause for celebration, dumb luck is cause for concern. Few representatives of either side in this international tug-of-war recognize that all industrialized nations – including Canada – share an unstable common denominator which requires urgent reform: a fiat-money system which not only fuels but requires stratospheric and perpetually rising consumer debt. As long as reforms are not undertaken to significantly change the system, huge debt loads will hold us hostage to unstable growth.

In the short term, a perpetually growing debt-load is financially unstable because it makes us vulnerable to shocks, including a rise in interest rates.  But more importantly, the practice is ecologically unstable because it prevents economic contraction to a sustainable size. Debt is what binds this hurricane of money and materials together as it spirals out-of-control.

The vicious debt-income-throughput cycle in Canada

The average Canadian is poorer than ever in real dollar terms because consumer debt accumulation has actually overtaken income growth to reach its highest proportion in history. Today, for every $1 earned, the average Canadian owes $1.47. The majority of Canadian consumer debt is accounted for in mortgages (70%), and home values in Canada actually continued their stunning rise throughout the international crisis. This growing bubble isn’t extraordinary in international terms – average Canadians are among the most heavily indebted in the world – and that’s precisely why Canada’s ‘strong economic fundamentals’ could blow over, particularly as the debt bubble tries to burst again.

The reason we’re indebted isn’t just because we want to be. The way the system is set up, once we’re indebted we’re pretty much there for life – especially if we are young home owners. Canadians, like most other rich-world consumers, have no option but to pay for large purchases with credit. Income, in today’s world, is simply a means to keep pace with debt.

So in addition to exploring the correlation between changes in income and material throughput – as we saw last time – I also cross-referenced the trends with debt.  Sure enough, the lines look similarly close…

Of course, growth is theoretically innocuous if you can achieve a ‘decoupling’ of money and materials. But as we considered last week, income and throughput are tightly coupled in Canada – in spite of the fact that it fits the characteristics of a ‘post industrial’ economy, with roughly three quarters of the population working in the service sector.

As Herman Daly and others have proposed, growth is fuelled by our need to keep up with compound interest of big payments like mortgages. This makes us work harder and consume more just to keep pace with debt payments. Richard Douthwaite explains,

If someone borrows $10,000 at 10 per cent interest, there are only two ways in which they can find the extra $1,000 they will owe twelve months later. One is by taking the money out of their salary or savings – in other words, impoverishing themselves. The other is by investing in some business enterprise that will give at least a 10 per cent return so that they can pay the interest from its profits.

Growth creates a cycle where the prospect of high-interest lending requires high-return investments, just like Canada’s top two growth industries – petroleum production and real estate. Growth, therefore, consists of a simultaneous expansion in income-debt-throughput as a kind of self-reinforcing cyclical system – a hurricane gathering strength.

In Canada, growth means more oil production and pricier real estate; pricier real estate means more debt for home purchasers; more debt accrued by home purchasers means less disposable income, further impoverishing us beyond the ratio of $1.47 for every dollar earned as real incomes decline.  Taken together, these features of the economy force us to work more to pay off the debt.

Anybody want to take bets on how far we can push the limit?

Debt and well-being

Any way you slice it, the amassing debt has negative implications for our wellbeing. In the short term, we are sprinting on a futile treadmill of production that makes us more vulnerable to economic ‘shocks’.  How so? Most Canadians have very little equity in their homes – they use them more often as a source of equity loans just to consume, spend, or even keep up with payments. As a result, many Canadians are only one payment away from bankruptcy. So far this century, bankruptcy rates have been identical to mortgage arrears in Canada (CGA). If interest rates were to go up as a result of another international crisis, a stunning and requisite rise in home values and debt would give way to a stunning and unanticipated rise in defaults and bankruptcies – just as we saw in the US market.

Over the long term, this trend quickly accelerates large-scale environmental problems associated with ever higher throughput and increases the risk that we will face more perceptible limits to growth, which would also lead to economic contraction – but of a more permanent kind.

The highly dubious ‘post industrial’ economy is built on debt. As we examined previously, it’s also balanced atop a stubbornly lopsided resource-based trophic pyramid. The practice requires exponentially rising home values, counts this rise as positive GDP-growth, encourages spending money on material stuff faster than it’s earned, and then it commands us to repeat this inherently unstable practice until either the financial system or the economy collapses under catastrophic strain.

On their own, the heat, air and water which make up a hurricane are pretty innocuous things. And depending on who you ask, economists might argue that debt, money and throughput are, too.  But if we take our shades off, we’ll see the hurricane coming. I hope we’ll take the opportunity to do something about it.

Sources

Sustainable Europe Research Institute material flow database (SERI)

Statistics Canada (StatsCan)

Certified General Accountants Association of Canada (CGA)

The Economist: The least-bad rich-world economy. The charms of Canada: good policies, good behaviour and good fortune: if only others could be as lucky.

Guest Contributor

James Johnston has a MPhil in Land Economy from Cambridge University.