Do We Need a Steady State Economy? One Politician’s Surprising Answer
An interview with a refreshingly astute politician: Andrew Weaver, climate scientist and first Green member of British Columbia’s legislature.
These are the CASSE blog articles on economic growth.
An interview with a refreshingly astute politician: Andrew Weaver, climate scientist and first Green member of British Columbia’s legislature.
Four hundred parts per million… it’s hard to fathom. Now more than ever we have to be wary of the “solutions” offered by the fossil fuel companies.
Writing a book can be a harrowing voyage, especially if you’re paddling upstream against the flood-stage current of conventional economic thinking.
Herman Daly suggests that changing the economy will require more than new policies; it’ll require a substantial change in worldview.
China is playing a dangerous game based on a seductive (but faulty) economic theory.
Brent Blackwelder sees three possibilities (granted they’re long-shots) for overcoming the obstacles to an economic paradigm shift.
A top priority of doing “everything we can to grow our economy” will worsen climate change, biodiversity loss, water shortages, and pollution.
It’s rare to find a Wall Street Journal columnist (and a Ronald Reagan appointee) calling for a steady-state economy.
If want to feel hopeful about solving the world’s most profound environmental and social problems, you can look to the wisdom of “enough.”
The short answer: an economy that allows corporations to externalize costs and trump the rights of indigenous people.