Preempting a Misleading Argument: Why Environmental Problems Will Stop Tracking with GDP
Brian explains how GDP growth will eventually stop tracking with environmental damage–but the reasons may not be what you’d expect!
Brian explains how GDP growth will eventually stop tracking with environmental damage–but the reasons may not be what you’d expect!
The population problem should be considered from the point of view of all populations–populations of both humans and their things–if we are going to achieve a steady state economy.
What do we do with the knowledge that we may be headed for climate catastrophe?
Is there an evolutionary mechanism stopping us from living within our planetary constraints? If so, can we overcome it before it is too late?
Daly challenges the assertion that a steady-state economy is inherently capitalistic and must be instead be based on a socialist system.
In Our Common Future, the 1987 report of the United Nations World Commission on Environment and Development, sustainable development is described as a process of change which meets the needs of the present generation without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs and aspirations. To achieve this objective, the report suggests a series of goals that should underlie national and international action on development.
Asian nations are running a dangerous experiment on the long-term consequences of short-term economic growth.
People who live simply and mindfully set the example for the good life in a steady state economy.
Policies needed to stabilize population and consumption will be difficult to enact, but difficult is a lot easier than impossible.
State of denial: it’s easier to pretend that unlimited economic growth can support an unlimited population, including immigrants.